6 Şubat 2016 Cumartesi

Renaissance Tower


Location: Kozyatağı, İstanbul, Turkey
Project Type: Office
Client: RENAISANCE Construction
Architect: FX FOWLE Architects
Electrical project: Okutan Engineering
Mechanical project: Okutan Engineering
Static Project: DeSimone Consulting Engineers APCB
Plant Project: Okutan Engineering
Rönesans tower is  one of the  tallest building in Anatolian side of İstanbul. Total high is 186m. The building is in construction site now and it will be used an offıce building at May, 2014. The building has 40 floors above ground level and 4 floors below ground level. Rönesans tower building has used BRB system.The system was used firstly for tall buildings in Turkey.Because of sustainable design and creative open areas, building took LEED gold  certificate. Offices has 3.70m high- comfortable .
DESIGN
Rönesans tower, one of the tallest building on the Anatolian side of İstanbul, creates a memorable presence for the headquarters of a dynamic construction. Occuping an ‘edge city’ context at the intersection of two major highways, the tower is completely free standing and functions as an obelisk, offering 360 degrees views from its prominent corner location. Its form marks the end of long vistas and announces the entrance to the city from the east. Its crystalline, chiseled massing, which takes cues from Ottoman geometric motifs and draws inspiration from surrounding local landforms, rotates approximately 33 degrees for optimum solar control.
STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA
A performance based design procedure was utilized for the seismic  analysis and design of the structure.The structure has been constructed primarily reinforced concrete while the spire has been framed with structural steel. The Buildings unique shape posed many challenges in the analysis, design and detailing of this signature structure. The structure has been designed to safely withstand even the most severe earthquakes in this seismically sensitive region.

FOUNDATION
A Geotechnical report was prepared and provided by Kilci Muhendislik. Foundation system for the tower was recommended to be a continuous reinforced concrete mat supported by large diameter caissons (Drilled shafts or piles). The caissons or piles will be socketed into the underlying rock for both compression and tension resistance. A continuous mat is required to spread the localized forces from the tower walls and columns to the various deep foundation elements below. Additionally, the mat will resist overturning forces from the core by mobilizing the counteracting loads from the large perimeter tower columns. A support of excavation system will be required during excavation of the below grade structure. 
SLAB
Slab system is flat slab, spanning between columns with no beams or girders. Long term deflection factor of concrete due to cracking is considered for design. Slabs are also checked for punching shear under both for gravitational and lateral forces since slabs are also attracting forces from shear wall core of the structure under lateral loading, transferring it to the columns. The flat-plate slab system (30cm thick typically) was chosen because of its simplicity and Architectural flexibility.
COLUMNS and SHEAR WALLS
The tower gravity system will consist of a concrete floor system supported by the interior core shear walls, perimeter square and circular concrete columns. The shear walls are located in the central core area surrounding the stairs and elevators. The shear walls vary in thickness from 100cm at the base to 60cm at the roof. Smaller 35, 30 and 25cm thick secondary walls are also provided around some elevator and stair shafts. The columns are located along the perimeter of the tower, range in size from 125x125cm square at the base to 75cm circular at the roof. Due to the architectural shape of the tower, most of the columns become sloped at some point in the building.
SPIRE
The tower is topped with large open-air spire, which is transferred onto the tower concrete structure by means of a steel transfer, or “Hat” truss. Spire structure on top of the building is made up of steel tube elements which are designed based on the cladding pressures provided by CPP in cladding report. Weight of the cladding is also considered in design. Seismic loads are significantly lower than the wind loads since structure is very light weight. Therefore, the spire structure is designed for the wind and gravity loads only and seismic loads have been ignored.
According to wind analysis, building is experiencing higher wind loads in Y direction causing a bigger overturning moment at the base level. Building drifts are bigger in Y direction since the loading is higher and stiffness of the core in Y direction is lower. This proves us the need for an outrigger at mid height of the tower to control drifts. The effect of outriggers on the building performance can be clearly seen in Y-direction inter story drift graph.
BRB SYSTEM
“Buckling Restrained Brace” system to achieve the dual purpose of providing substantial static stiffness for wind loading, while providing substantial energy dissipation for seismic loading. BRB systems provide energy dissipation through hysteretic behavior of steel in pure axial tension and compression. Such systems are currently produced by Star Seismic and Nippon.
The bond-preventing layer decouples the casing from the core. Accordingly, the axial load of the brace is transmitted by the steel core only, while the casing - through its flexural rigidity – provides the proper lateral support against flexural buckling of the core.
4 braces was used at 18th.floor, This braces work like shock absorber and provide a precaution against to earthquake which apply forces Beams, columns and braces arranged to form a vertical truss. Resist lateral earthquake forces by truss action. BRB yield both in tension and compression - no buckling !! System combines high stiffness with high ductility.
FACADE
The unitized four-sided structural glass facade is comprised of large vision areas and full depth shadow boxes to create a monochromatic surface. The tower is highlighted by an intermittent scrim of textured metal on the south, east and west elevations that provide shading and visual interest from both the interior and exterior. The tower features double height sky gardens with a hybrid unitized curtain wall and spanning glass mullions. The podium will be comprised of a hybrid glass wall with diagonal spanning members to support the crystalline sightlines.

 

Sanatsal Mekanlarda Kadınlar

Bugün, uluslararası İstanbul Bienalinin sanat ortamında önemsendiği bir dönemi yaşarken, sergilenen Türk sanatçılar arasındaki kadın erkek ayırımının epeyce fazla olduğu dikkat çekicidir. Bu bienale seçilen Türk sanatçılarını değerlendirdiğimizde toplam 62 erkek sanatçıya karşın 34 kadın sanatçının yapıtlarının sergilendiği görülür. Yıllar boyunca Türk kadın sanatçıların erkek sayısının yarısına tekabül ettiği görülür. Bu bienallerde başarıyla Türkiyeyi temsil eden kadın sanatçılardan özellikle Gülsün Karamustafa, Ayşe Erkmen, Hale Tenger başta olmak üzere hemen hepsi dünyanın birçok yerinde çalışmalarını sürdürmektedir. Diğer taraftan, bir ikisi dışında erkek sanatçıların uluslararası ortamda bu başarıyı yakalayamadıkları açıktır. Burada, sunulan sanat kadar diğer bazı kriterlerin etkin olduğu kabul edilmelidir.

Sanat açısından kadın sanatçının yeniyi yakalama, deneyselliği, hatta kadınlık birikiminin getirdiği yeni malzeme, teknik ve görüşü sunma mücadelesinde erkeklere nazaran daha başarılı olduğu savunulabilir. Diğer taraftan, kadının feminist hareketler sonucunda tüm uluslararası sanat ortamında tercih edilmesi, bir yabancı dil bilmesi ve görgüsü, hatta ilişkileri, onun sanat ortamında aranılan sanatçı 
olmasıyla bağdaştırılabilir.


Ülkemizde zaman zaman sanat ortamında sayısı artmaya başlayan fuarlar arasında en başarılı sanatçıların/yüksek fiyata  satan sanatçıların isimleri verilir, ama bunların arasında yer almaz kadın sanatçı. Sebebi, çoğu koleksiyoncu bir yapıtı alırken beğensin beğenmesin genelde para kaybedeceği bir esere yatırım yapmaz. Kadın sanatçının ürettiği dönemde ne kadar başarılı olsa da sanatına devam edip edemeyeceği her zaman için bir tehlike arz eder.Danışmanlar galeriler koleksiyoncular küratörler müzeler her ne kadar kendilerinin objektif kararlar verdiklerini söyleseler de kadın sanatçının onların kontrolü altında olan sanat ortamında yeri sınırlıdır.
Sanat tarihinde kadınların önemi ancak feminist eylemlerin sonucu olarak Amerika ve Avrupada benimsenmeye başlanmış ve ancak 60’lı yıllardan itibaren kadın sanatçı tarihlerinin araştırma ve yazılarının katkılarıyla bir bellek oluşturmaya başlamıştır. Türkiyeye baktığımızda bir kadın sanatçının galerilerde sergiler açabilmesine karşın koleksiyonlara alınma şansı azdır.1970lerde devlet, belediye, banka galerilerinin yanı sıra açılmaya başlayan özel galerilerle sanatçıların sergileme olanakları çoğaldığından bu konuda pek sorun yaşanmadığı söylenmelidir.Ancak çoğu koleksiyoncu seçimlerinde kadın erkek ayrımı üstünde durmasa da koleksiyonları incelendiğinde pek azının kadın sanatçıya yatırım yaptığı söylenebilir. Anne olmanın kadının sanatını yapmasını engellediği fikri en başta gelir.Bu özelliğin onun zamanını aldığı gibi yaratıcılığını da zayıflattığı inancı neredeyse gelenekselleşmiş bir görüştür. Bugünün sanat ortamında uzun yıllar öteki olan kadına bakışın değişmesi biraz da 20.yy ın ilk yarısındaki yaratıcı dönemin duraklaması sonucu postmodernizmin getirdiği çelişkiler ile olmuştur. Yüzyıllarca süren erkek sanatçı hegemonyası nihayet alternatif yaratıcılığıyla kadına hatta batı dünyası dışında yeni kimliklere yönelmiştir. Yeniçağın küratörlerinin bu arayış içinde gence ve kadına yakın durmaya başladığı söylenebilir. Ancak her şeyden evvel kadın sanatçının kendisiyle ilgili geçmişi anlaması ve önündeki örneklerden yola çıkarak bilinçli bir yol haritası çizmesi de gereklidir.Amerikada 70li yılların başında Whitney bienaline seçilen sanatçılar arasında kadın sanatçıların %5 oranında olması onların toplu protesto eylemleri sonucunda daha sonraki yıllarda kadın sanatçı sayısının şaşırtıcı derecede artmış olması dikkate alınırsa bu yol haritasının temelinde birleşmenin doğru bir seçim olduğu görülebilir.

70li ve 80li yıllardaki kendi sanat ortamımıza baktığımızda böyle bir sorgulamanın hiç de gerçekleşmediğini görürüz. Kadın sanatçılar yarışmalarda aldıkları ödüllerle mutludurlar ve zaten sanat ortamında etkin olmayan müzenin satın almalarını hiç de sorgulamazlar. 1977-87 arasında M.S.G.S.Ü.tarafından gerçekleştirilen ve zamanında en önemli sergi olan yeni eğilimler sergilerinde 1977 de ödül alan kadın sanatçı yoktur.


Daha sonraki yıllarda, Ayşe Erkmen, Neşe Erdok, Azade Köker 1979 da, Nur Koçak, Füsun Onur 1981 de Tomur Atagök 1983 te, Fatoş Beykal, Lale Özgüder, Handan Börütücene, Şeyma Reisoğlu, Mine Ternar 1985 te, Gülsün Karamustafa 1987 de ödülleri alarak dikkat çekmiştir.Daha sonraki yıllarda, Ayşe Erkmen, Neşe Erdok, Azade Köker 1979 da, Nur Koçak, Füsun Onur 1981 de Tomur Atagök 1983 te, Fatoş Beykal, Lale Özgüder, Handan Börütücene, Şeyma Reisoğlu, Mine Ternar 1985 te, Gülsün Karamustafa 1987 de ödülleri alarak dikkat çekmiştir.


İslam etkisinin azalması ve batı kültürü ile yakınlaşma Osmanlı ailelerinin kızlarını eğitme yolunda attıkları adımları hızlandırmıştır. Batının osmanlı yönetimindeki topraklarındaki kültür mirasının talanını önlemek üzere gerçekleştirdiği çoğu girişimi saray tarafından desteklenmiştir. Fransanın da yaşam biçimini benimseyen Osmanlının üst sınıfı başta saray olmak üzere kadınlar günün moda kıyafetlerini giyerek, Fransızca öğrenerek, piyano çalarak ya da resim yaparak yeni bir döneme girmişlerdir. 1919 türk ressamlar cemiyeti, 1929 güzel sanatlar birliği, 1916 galatasaray sergileri. 1950lerden itibaren kadın sanatçıların giderek daha üretken olduğu izlenir. Üç boyutlu işlere odaklanan sanatçı sayısı artış göstermiştir. Heykel, Özgün baskı, Seramik ,Fotoğraf, video,yerleştirme..

70li yıllardan itibaren daha etkin olan bu grubun öncelikle özellikleri arasında yurtdışıyla yakın ilişkileri, yabancı dil bilmeleri, sanatsal çalışmalarının yanı sıra çoğunun araştırmacı- yazar özellikleri ve üniversite öğretim elemanı olmaları da dikkat çekicidir. Bir anlamda yaptıkları işleri gerisinde onları destekleyen bilinç ve görüş bulunmaktadır. Son yıllarda bazı sanatçıların Rene Block gibi uluslararası küratörlerin desteğini almalarının yanı sıra yabancı koleksiyoncuların, hatta müzelerin koleksiyonlarına girmiş olmaları, Türk kadın sanatçılarının mekanlarının genişlediğinin habercisidir.


İstanbul’da Sanat // Çağdaş gösteriler ve tarihe bir bakış

İstanbul’un sanat yaşamı ile ilgili iki temel tartışma sunulur. İlki kentin bugünü ile tarihi arasında başlıca bağlantı oluşturan batılılaşma konusu diğeri de İstanbul’da sanatın en önemli neden ve içeriğinin kendine duyduğu hayranlık olduğu iddasıdır. 21.yy da İstanbul dünyanın en büyük popüler kültürel merak konularından biri olmuştur. Bunun nedeni sadece çok zengin çağdaş sanatsal etkinlikler sunması değil, İstanbul’un kentsel miraslarından birini kentin kültürel atmosferini etkileyen iki bin yıllık bir belleğin oluşturmasıdır.Bugün uluslararası kalabalıkları cezbeden nitelikler tarihi anıtlar, kentin zengin flora ve yerleşimlerinin güzelliği gibi doğal estetikler ve sanat eylemleri olduğu kadar aynı zamanda sosyal kurgusu, davranışları ve kentsel örüntünün bir tür düzensizliği ve çeşitliliğidir. İstanbulda doğu ve batının bütünleşmesi bugünkü estetiğinin en büyük oranını oluşturur. İstanbulun süslenerek resimlerde temsil edilerek aynalarda ve kendi sularında yansıtılarak kendine hayran olunan görünüşünün ardında kentin çoğul niteliği rol oynamaktadır.

İstanbulda kimlikler korunurken toplumun çoğul yapısı her zaman kültürel bir gerçek olarak gözler önündedir.Kendi karmaşık kültürünü oluşturmaktan çok İstanbul, her farklı kültürün süreklilik aradığı, kendi zaman ve mekanını yaratıp kendi müziğini çalıp kendi dilini konuştuğu bir yer olmuştur.İstanbul üzerine odaklanılmasını sağlayan önemli bir konu da 1980 ‘lerde gelişen postmodern eleştiridir. İstanbul farklılıkların kenti olarak kalmış ve hiçbir zaman modernliğin öncüsü olamamıştır. Bu geçmişin her yerde hissedilen nostaljisi, Orhan Pamuk’ a göre İstanbul’un asıl cazibesi ve gerçek yüzüdür. Hiç bir zaman homojenleşemiyecek, bütün dillerin de konuşulup da hiçbir zaman birbirini anlamadıkları ve bütün bütünleşme çabalarının farklılıkla sonlandığı İstanbul postmodernliğin  en güçlü örneğidir.

Altıncı yüzyılın yapısı Ayasofya, Justinyenin Bizans mirası ,önemli örnekleri olan kiliseler ve duvarlarla kenti süslemektedir.Halka açık kutlamalar ve bayramlar ile Osmanlı başkenti de güç gösterisinde Bizanstan aşağı kalmamıştır.Batılı mimarları İstanbula çağırarak kenti saraylar, camiler ve külliyelerle donatarak kente ilk Osmanlı kimliğini kazandıran Fatih Sultan Mehmetten sonra hemen hemen bütün sultanlar iddaalı mimari projeleriyle kentin görkemine katkıda bulundular. İstanbulun birçok batılı niteliği ilk kez Osmanlının askeri alanda batıya karşı geriliğini anlaması ve Parisli yaşam tarzına karşı hayranlığın uyanmasıyla batılalaşmanın ve ona bağlı yeni bir sanat anlayışının ortaya çıktığı 18. yy da belirmiştir.Bu dönemde kadınlar hiç değilse eğlence ortamlarında sosyal sahnede görünmeye başlarlar ve başkentte görkemli şenlikler düzenlenir.

20.yy ın ikinci yarısında modernizmin sorgulanması kültürel farklılıklara karşı bir ilgi doğurdu.Daha önceleri sanat dünyası için önemli olmayan yerlerde bienaller düzenlenmeye başladı.Batıdan sanatçılar buralara sanat çalıştayları yapmaya davet edildi ve Avrupa dışından batıya okumaya giden sanatçıların sayısı bir hayli çoğaldı.Amerikada sanat eğitimi moda oldu.Sanat artık elit tabaka ve entellektüeller için prestijli bir uğraş olmaya başladı.Birçok yeni sergi serileri oluşmaya başladı.Yeni sanat dergileri, Avrupadan gelen sanatçılar yeni sanat yaklaşımları ile sergiler çağdaş sanatın patlamasına hazır bir ortam yaratmıştı. İstanbul bienali böyle bir ortam içinde doğmuştur.

1980lerin sonlarında başlayan İstanbul bienali ilk yıllarında oldukça farklıydı. O vakit mesele hangi Türk sanatçılarının Türkiyeyi temsil etmeye layık oldukları sorusuydu.İstanbulun yarışmacı ve ticari atmosferi içinde sanatçılar tanınmak istiyor ve kendilerine iş ısmarlanmasını bekliyorlardı.Zamanla bu atmosfer İstanbul bienali için kısıtlı olmaya başladı. Üçüncü bienalden sonra İstanbul kültür sanat vakfı yabancı küratörleri davet etmiştir.İstanbul bienali küresel sanat ortamının en önemli etkinliklerinden biri haline gelmiştir. Bu başarısında İstanbul kentinin rolü büyüktür. 21.yy’ da kültür turizminin gelişmesinin, sanat ve refah yatırımlarının artması bienalin bu başarısında rol oynamıştır.Öte yandan İstanbul bienali keyfi olarak toplanıp sergilenen ve çoğunlukla birbirine benzeyen ikinci derece işlerin düzensiz bir sunumu olmaya başlamıştır.2009 bienalinin İstanbulda gündelik yaşamda karşımıza çıkan sokak görüntülerine referans veren sergi ve yerleştirmelerinin düzensizliği ve keyfiliği yanında İstanbul sokaklarındaki gerçek çok daha etkileyici, politik ve kültürel durumlarla daha yakından ilişkili ve sergilenen sanattan çok daha sürpriz doludur.İstanbul’un sanat ortamına sosyolojik bir açıdan bakan Sibel Yardımcı yeterli bir devlet desteğinin eksikliği karşısında özel holding ve vakıfların İstanbuldaki sanat etkinliklerini de ele geçirmelerinden ve kültürün özelleştirilmesinden duyduğu rahatsızlığı şöyle açıklamıştır.‘Küresel sanat pazarlarını etkilemek için festivaller, Avrupa ve Amerikanın kültür başkentlerindeki kurumların tanımladığı estetik beğeni ve meşru sanat kriterlerine göre düzenlenirler. Çoğu zaman İstanbul festivalleri kendi dillerini geliştiremez.. kendi özelliklerini gözardı ederler; isimleri ve uygulamaları ile prestij ve şöhret kazandıracağını umdukları uluslararası küratörlere bağlanırlar’.(Yardımcı 2007:5)




Hemen hemen bütün İstanbul bienallerinde başlıca sanat odağı kutsal, gündelik, tarihi yerleri ve gecekondularıyla kentin kendisi olmuştur. Anıtlar sanatçıların fantezilerinin arka planını oluşturur: Süleymaniyede Buren, Aya irinide Kounellis sergilemiş ve Ayasofya sanatçıların özel vitrini olmuştur. Bunun iki anlamı vardır, ya kent meydanları artık yerleşik anlamlarını ve kimliklerini yitirmiştir ya da herhangi bir mekan keyfiyen dönüştürülebilir.Bu da İstanbul’a sürekli metamorfoz halinde akışkan bir kimlik vermektedir. Bazı tarihi yerlerin ve anıtların bienal mekanı olarak kullanılması örneğin kentin en değerli ve anlamlı yapılarından biri olan Süleymaniye kolonlarının Fransız sanatçı Buren tarafından renkli çizgilerle donatılması belleği ve kamusal alanları silen yok eden bir uygulamadır. Kentin anılarına ve değer taşıyan unsurlarına sanki yokmuş gibi ya da çağdaş sanatın onları canlandıracağı kanısıyla yaklaşmak, bazı postmodern ve dekonstrüktif yaklaşımları akla getirmektedir.İstanbul birçok şekilde eski görkemli geçmişinden beslenmektedir.Aya irinide konser dinlemek ,Topkapı sarayında ya da Ayasofyada sergi görmek insanı çoşturan şeylerdir. 2007 bienaline katılan çağdaş sanatçı Ferhat Özgür’ün fotoğraflarında simgelediği gibi hiçbir sanat eseri bu yerlerin cazibesi ile yarışamaz. Öte yandan çağdaş dünyanın bir parçası olduğunu iddaa eden bir kent için yeni mekanların yaratılması bir sorumluluktur. Bu anlamda yeniliği olan tek yer Bilgi üniversitesinin Osmanlı döneminden kalma elektrik üretim santrali alanında inşa ettiği santral lakaplı büyük sergi mekanıdır.1922-83 yılları arasında kente elektrik sağlayan eski üretim binasına bitişik olarak inşa edilen yeni müze ve galeri modern tasarım ile makine estetiğini bütünleştiren ilginç bir mimari yapıdır.

1980’ lerde Türkiyenin liberal ekonomiyi benimsemesi ve ekonomik ve sosyal alanda sanatın önemli bir veri haline gelmesi ile istanbul’un zengin ailelerine ait holdingler de sanat koleksiyonlarına yatırım yapmaya başlamışlardır.Sabancı müzesi ,Sanayi müzesi, Pera müzesi gibi Koç ailelerinin müzeleri ile Kadir Has müzesi bunlara örnektir.İstanbul’un bugünkü sanat zenginliğinin;gösteri merakının ve kendine hayranlığının bir parçası olduğu ve geçmişte farklı dönemlerde İstanbul’un hükümdarlarının kendi şöhretlerini yansıtmak için sanatı kullanmış olduklarıdır. Birçok sanatçı ister mimarisine bakılsın ister coğrafyasına bakılsın ya da Devrim Erbil’in yaşam boyu yaptığı resimlerde olduğu gibi kuşbakışı görülsün İstanbul’un kendisi bir sanat eseridir


Analysis of Architecture of Le Corbusier

Thesis: Le Corbusier is one of the most important architects of the world, because his architecture can be examined  in different ways suchas his completed building designs, the details found within them and the  influence he has had on other architectural styles.
         I.            His completed building designs
            A.Villa Sovaye
1. History of the building
            2. Damage during World War   
            3. General structure
            4. Rooms
            B. Notre Dame Du Haut
                  1. History of the building
                  2. General structure
                  3. Details of structure
       II.            The details found within them
A. Somatic Detail
     1. Using colour symbolically
     2. Colours
     3. Effect of colours on form
     4. Colour of concrete
     5. A new term in furniture area
     6. Human- limb objects
     7.Metal construction furniture
   B. Elements Of  The Architectural Promenade
     1. Occuring two different realms bu doors
     2. Pivoting door
     3. Transperancy of doors
     4. Stair types
     5. Spiral stair
     6. Occuring a different composition by staircase
C. Light and Dark
     1. Reflection
     2. Varieties of artifical lightings
     3. Uplighters
     4. Purpose of rooflights
     5. Framing a view of sky
     6. Geometric lines rooflight to define the space
     III.            The influence he has had on other architectural styles
A.      Purism
     1. Purism in architecture
                 2. Le Corbusier's purist movements in architecture
           B. Modernism
                1. Contents of modernism
                2. Feature of modern architecture
                3. Modern architecture
                4. Five points of modern architecture
                5. "Form follows function"
                6. Modernism in Corbusier's works
                                             
Abstract
Le Corbusier is one of the most famous and important architects of the world and his architecture can be examined in terms of variety of aspects. Le Corbusier’s completed buildings, designs and works are very important because Le Corbusier brought a new term to architecture area thanks to his innovations. He gave inspirations to architectures and designers. In addition to his completed buildings the details found within Le Corbusier’s buildings and designs showed his depted knowledges and artistic styles. The final phase of research expresses the influence in architecture. His influences brought him to the wider aspects of architecture. By identifying all these phases are explained with the examples, Le Corbusier’s architecture explains from different aspects.

Charles Eduoard Jeannerret  who  is  better known  as Le Corbusier was born in Switzerland in 1887. Although he is famous for being one of the pioneers of modern architecture, he is also painter, designer, sculpture, urbanist and writer. He was one of the most influential architects  whose buildings and writings had a revolutionary effect on the international development of modern architecture of the 20th century. He dedicated himself to provide better living conditions in pretty solid place for the residents of crowded cities. Travelling throughout Europe to observe architectural styles he met Ozenfant, who introduced him to Purism, and with whom he collaborated in writing several articles. Corbusier's main interest was large urban projects and city planning. Many of his designs were rejected, but they influenced other architects throughout the world. In five decades of his career, many buildings have been constructed scattered throughout  Europe,  India,  Russia and America. many have attempted to understand him, as he exhibited himself after that, he became an authoritative on publications, competitions, commenting on everything and eveywhere at on once. Consequently, Le Corbusier is one of the most important architects of the world, because his architecture can be examined  in different ways such as his completed building designs, the details found within them and the  influence he has had on other architectural styles.

 In architecture, Le Corbusier’s why is it so important to understand that in the first as their completed buildings can be analyzed.It is significant for him that people understand his ideas and imaginations in arhitecture way therefore he wanted to transfer his architecture through their senses with completed buildings. To begin with, when Villa Savoye which is the private house for major community is observed in terms of history and structure Le Corbusier’s effects are can be seen easly. For example, history of Villa Savoye stands out in order to better understand construction periods.Villa Savoye which is called “modernist villa” built between 1928–1931 in Poisy where an hour’s ride from Paris fort the Savoye Family. After owners moved their home, because of the variety problems Villa Savoye was exposed much alteration such as lakes of water (Burri, (1999, p.15). Also, during the German occupation, the house which is located between from the leading works of Le Corbusier's, was damaged and could not be used in the World War II.Due toAmerican and German occupation in world war two, the furniture, doors were taken by the soldiers (Palmes, 1960, p.70).The building was restored by the French Government and today it is used as museum.Villa Savoye which has been witness  long and difficult period. It is clear that although it lost their meaning together with its surrounding environment  it can maintain Le Corbusier’s effects currently.In addition,structure of the building  is a other important  point for understanding architects of Le Corbusier.Villa Savoye that was built a large area outside of the city is a unique structure in terms of its design and space of using through builts of the term.Le corbusier used all  possibilities of his continued consepts since 1915  in Villa Savoye that has 400 squaremeter area of floor.Walls were used for seperating instead of load bearing because columns were used to provide it and ramps, sunlight,horizontal windows were preffered by Le Corbusier in this house.Four walls limit the main body of the house and all facades of the house  are girded sliding (Boesiger & Girsberger, 1967,  p.58). Although its large area, built field is small, the house has a too big bedroom, living room, which are located around garden two small guest rooms, a kitchen and pantry (Papadaki, 1948, p.30).  Villa Savoye has ground floor, between the columns first floor and roof floor. This makes it clear that when structural properties of the house are considered, Villa Savoye is one of the first examples of modernism. Indeed, Villa Savoye is an important architectural work in many terms.

In addition to Villa Savoye, Notre Dame Du Haunt is the other significant  built which is to be  investigated variety terms.To begin with, it is nearly imposible to start history of informally known as Ronchamp the Chapel of Notre Dame Du Haunt. Ronchamp which is one of beter examples of the Swiss and Franco completed in 1954 as a religious architecture built. When Le Corbusier was begun to design of Ronchamp, although reformists in the church wanted to clear their name of the corruption by using modern art, Corbusier’s opinion was not same with them for instance, he wanted the  extension  to enable auiet contemplation and thought (Kroll, 2010, para.3-4). Obviously, while Le Corbusier was constructing the Ronchamp, he has a free architecture. Secondly, Ronchamp’s structure provides to take precedence of building others. Two concrete membranes which create the main part of the structure are used for seperation and form the shell- like roof of Ronchamp (Boesiger, 1967, p.51). Curved roof and walls let the light to seep into from outside thanks to small openings (Maak, 2011, p.8). All of them are considered reasons of Ronchamp’s to become one of best buildings are irregular small windovs and mushroom- like head, thick concrete cover.To conclude, Le Corbusier designed and constructed Notre Dame Du Haunt more interesting instead of more primitive and sculptural.

The reason why Le Corbusier should be examined in terms of the details found within his completed buildings, designs because in order to learn and understand viewpoints of his architectural philoshopy, the meaning of detail and the way in which Le Corbusier used in it his art life are a fundamental issue. Each architectural detail which represents a micro part of presence plays a role to be occured the meaning of the whole and Le Corbusier explained that every organism in detail which is set up according to logical rules with the whole, provides connections around the axis between two poles (Samuel, 2007, p.3). To begin with, the details found within his buildings and designs include somatic detail which is related to reflections of emotions and sensations to architecture details. For example Le Corbusier used colour symbolically in order to affect mood and to claim or reduce the entity of architectural elements (Samuel, 2007, p.64). Warm and cold blue, light and dark green, deep reds, brown were used in construction of building (Chamberlain, n.d, para. 3). Particularly, red and blue which were accepting intensities, were used more powerful in his works because all perceptions and moral typicals of the colours were instantly evoked a play by Le Corbusier. Red and blue which used to bring into his buildings in his works provided to be defined forms of buildings in light-dark (Heer, 2009, p.104). Moreover, in Le Corbusier's later works in 1950s, variety of colours which were used usually symbolic was often inhabitant in his buildings with concrete furniture. In relation with the colour of concrete, Le Corbusier stated that although the appearence of the cement is gloomy, it does not show the cement is gloomy because colours have worths with their environments (Samuel, 2007, p.64). From the examples and information given above, it is clear that Le Corbusier used the colour sembolically in order to reflect the sensations to architecture details and diminish the presence of architectural elements. In addition to the colour, the furniture is another obvious somatic detail of the details found within Le Corbusier's buildings and designs. Primarily, Le Corbusier created a new term in furniture area which was defined as equipment took the place of old word furniture which means limited benefits and becoming solid habits. By given the word 'mobilier' his goal was to provide a determined way of life without confusion in order to relinquish the inhabitants of his buildings better able to come over from the act of living (Samuel, 2007, p.59). Because of this, Le Corbusier brought emotional and physical sights to architecture in furniture area. For him, the furnishing of the home was human limb objects to put another way an englargement of human body were in proportion to limbs and adapted to gestures (Samuel, 2007, p.59). In this way, Le Corbusier stated that metal construction lent gave more possibilities to sit with new methods compared to wood material for chairs. Because of this, he created new metal and leather equipment which provided to become free (Samuel, 2007, p.59). From the information given above, it is clear that Le Corbusier used the emotional and physical aspects in furniture design.

Apart from the somatic details found within Le Corbusier's buildings and designs, elements of the architectural promenade are a way of explaining his architecture. This is borne out by doors in his architecture. The two realms are created by doors because wall is cut by door in two longitudinally. This longitudinal seperation of space demonstrated itself in Le
Corbusier's doors which have two very different faces. Le Corbusier explained that the door from the hall to the living room in the penthouse at 24 Rue Nungesser ET Coli, indicated this situation because one side, facing into living room, is black, the other side is cream which provided to belong the spaces they were devoted  a covering wing of passing space was provided to guide the visitor in thanks to the  opening the vast pivoting door (2007, p.132). Pivoting doors which occur two area and create a distinctive aspect were used commonly in Corbusier's works because when the door is pushed one way, an against motion is resulted in the other direction. Corbusier compared the curve of the door swinging to 24- hour day in other words the daily movement of the sun which involved in his contrasting faces (Samuel, 2007, p.132).  However, Corbusier used door which abjured pivoting.his ability was to change the degree of transparency of thresholds. In spite of the transparency of all elements of the composition, the glass beam and the concrete made an entrance, frame. Even though, there was no door, only frame made existence of door as onto the brigded entrance of La Tourette (Samuel, 2007, p.134). Clearly, Le Corbusier used door as an element of the architectural promenade because of the effect on the division of space by doors. In addition to doors, stairs are another element of the architectural promenade. Samuel (2007) stated that equally Le Corbusier conceived a limited diversity stair types to be used again and clarified across his career. The spiral, the dogleg and the contielevered stair which played a role in the psychological promenade, were involved in his works (p.149). The spiral form was used again and again in his works because repetition of the same architectural type was center to his concept of evolution. Le Corbusier used spiral stairs to provide a respiration to space (Samuel, 2007, p. 150). Moreover, Le Corbusier used a metal railing on the inside and a low wall to other side like the parapet wall of the balcony in a work, thanks to this, staircase seemed as if it had been quited from the balcony to move down to the ground in contrast, this low balustrade wall showed itself to go around at the landing and make room for storage (Etlin, 1994, p.145). From the examples and information given above it is clear that different types of stair were took place in Corbusier's works in an element of the architectural promenade.

Asides from the  elements of the architectural promenade found within Le Corbusier's buildings and designs, light and dark is a way of understanding his architecture. Artificial lighting is an important detail found within his building and designs. Le Corbusier approached to artifical lighting because of importance of reflection in his works. With the design of the Villa Sovaye, he used the ceiling as a reflective service with tabular lamps hung below in an inverted through.For the Caprenter Centre, Le Corbusier designed to give priority cleanliness of buildings structure. Color was used as a reflector the under of floors were painted to white. Thanks to this, light was illuminated in gutter unconstantly (Banham cited by Samuel, 2007, pp. 91-92). Le Corbusier used different glass and metal screens of industrial origin for artificial lighting. Naked bulb, fluorescent, incandescent and lamps were designed in his works (Vasquez, 2010, pp. 20-27). Moreover, during his career, uplighters took a place with Corbusier's big interest in works. Uplighters were used to create a different atmospher. For pavillion suisse, uplighters were put at the ground level. It provided the building above appearance to be floating on light and at Ronchamp, uplighters when seen from at night, added mystique to chapel (Samuel, 2007, p.92). In this way variety types of artifical lighting objects were used in Corbusier's works to create different atmosfer perceptions. In addition to artificial lighting, rooflights are another element of light and dark in his works. Although various rooflights were designed in order to conduct different purposes by Corbusier. Some rooflights were designed with simple aim of deducing the light into the heart of building. Other rooflights framed the appearence of the sky (Samuel, 2007, p.84). An effect of appearence of sky is conducted in two fourth floor seminar rooms of Carpenter Centre. One room which had green rooflight was painted black and the other room which red rectangular rooflight was painted white. Thanks to this, the two rooms had two direct oppositions to one another. The sky expressed itself as a focus for reflection (Curtis cited by Samuel, 2007, p.85). The another example, Baker stated that at the dominician convent of La Tourette, Le Corbusier's hard concrete volumes were broken out by trapezoidal rooflights and light slots. The seven tropezoidal rooflights which faced south and become light columns into the sacristy. Walls were cut by light slots and geometric lines of light gave description to the space (2002, p. 24). In conclusion, it can be concluded that Le Corbusier used rooflights in his works for different purposes.

The reason why corbusier should be examined in terms of the influence he had on other style, because in order understand his architecture.To begin with, purism in architecture which were devoleped by Le Corbusier and Ozanfant Amedee in 20th century is current of art with cubism. Purism is described certain, open, clean and pure and regular formats the purists and they want to reflect machine age.  Although purism only rests aesthetics, it contributes to the acceptance of a system in which mathematics exists in the outer world to shape a final truth (Boyer, 2011, p.267). It is obvious that with the  bringing out  of Purism, there has been new period in architecture.In addition Le Corbusier who is the founder of pürism to be associated with the purist movements.He used lots of  him projects purism currents such as Villa Savoye,Ronchamp Chapel. Because Le Corbusier designed it in 1929 Villa Savoye is pure ‘purism’ rather than the rough purism of later styles (Blake, 1960, p.63). Natural elements were preferred rather than the mechanical forms used by Le Corbusier in his earlier years (Richards, 2003, p.32). All these examples prove that Purism is not considered without Le Corbusier.

In addition to Purism, Modernism is a way of understanding his architecture. Modernism in architecture another influence, Le Corbusier has had on architectural styles. Although a lot of people believe modern architecture is constructed in contemporary area, the modern period started in 1880s and went on to the 1970s. Modern architecture can be characterized by its functionality, circulation, use of machine and conformance to Le Corbusier's five points of architecture (Crooks, n.d. para.1). Moreover, Pei explains that little or no adorments, factory made parts, man made materials such as metal and concrete, focus on function and disobedience the custom styles are main issues of the modernist architecture (n.d., "Modernism"). Although most modern architectures use a limited color which are white, black and gray, functional architectural elements which are door, stair and window are used with details meticulously in modern architecture (Crooks, n.d., para. 2). Consequently, it is obvious above that modernism is an influence reflects to architecture. In addition to modernism in architecture, Le Corbusier's modernist movement in architecture is important issue to understand his architecture. Le Corbusier was one of the most modern architecture. He analysed the modern architecture on five points. These are pilots or columns,  an open floor plan, building's structure, a free facade and an accessible rooftop garden (Crooks, n.d., para. 5). While corbusier was characterizing the modern architecture, he said that a house should be " a machine for living". This means discarding the decoration and exposition the "real purpose" of buildings. It was explained as a slogan "form follows function" (Reno, 2009, para. 6). For example, when a roof supplies protection, protection is wanted to see. In
Corbusier's works at the centre in Zurich, roof shouts "I am a roof". This situation is valid for other features of buildings. If duty of windows is to bring the light into room, large-paned should be used or if steeel girders support to building, they are not concealed (Reno, 2009, para. 7-8). In conclusion, Corbusier wanted to reveal the real purpose of building which should be exposed is important to understand for Le Corbusier's modernist movement in architecture.

In conclusion, Le Corbusier’s completed works, designs, the details found within them and the influence he had on other architectural styles explains that Le Corbusier is one of the most important architects of the world. Le Corbusier played a big role in architecture area and brought new solutions, influences and creatind designings to architecture. This should motivate architects and designers to learn the foundations of architecture intensely. It should not forgetten that with Le Corbusier’s important additions to architecture area, Architecture students should learn a lot of informations from Le Corbusier’s details in architecture. Consequently, the growing realization of the signifiance of Le Corbusier’s additions to architecture, the details in his works and influences on other architectural styles will provide informations and give inspirations to people in architecture area in the near future.

References
Baker, N. (2002). Daylight design of buildings.
Blake, P. (1960).The master buildings. New York, Knopf.
Boyer, M. C. (2011). Le Corbusier, homme de letters. New York, Princeton ArchitecturalPress.                              
Burri, R. (1999). Le Corbusier: Photographs by Rene Burri Magnum: moments in the life                              
Chamberlain, M. (n.d.). Colortherapy: Le Corbusier, kt. color and the Villa Savoye. Retrived             Crooks, R. (n.d.). Characteristics of the modernist architectural style. Retrived from http://w            ww.ehow.com/info_8527884_characteristics-modernist-architectural-style.html
Etlin, R. A. (1994). Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier: The romantic legacy. New York: Manchester University Press
Heer, J. D. (2009). The architectonic colour.  Retrived from http://books.google.com.
Kroll, A. (2010). Ronchamp/ Le Corbusier. Retrieved 
Le Corbusier (1960).My work  (Palmes, J, Trans.). London: Architectural Press. (Original              work published in n.d.)
Le Corbusier (1967). Le Corbusier 1910-65 (Boesiger, W. & Girsberger, H. Trans.). Zurich:           Les Editions d’Architecture. (Original work published in n.d.)
Maak,  N. (2011). Le Corbusier: the architect on the beach. Munich, Hirmer.
Papadaki, S. (1948). Le Corbusier, architect, painter, writer. New York,The Macmillan                    Company.
Pei, I. M. ( n.d.), Modernism. Retrived from http://architecture.about.com/od/20thcent   s/ig/Modern-Architecture/Modernism.htm
Reno, P. R. ( 2009). The sledgehammer of modernism. Retrived from http://www.firstthings.co m/onthesquare/2009/03/the-sledgehammer-of-modernism
Richards, S. (2003). Le Corbusier and the concept of self. New Hawen, Yale University Press.
Samuel, F. (2007). Le Corbusier in detail. The Netherlands: Elsevier
Vasquez, C. (2010). Light in the work of Le Corbuiser. doi: 10.4067/S0717-69962010000300003